Learning #1: Can we use data and land to capture (a lot of) carbon dioxide?

  • Future Forest’s great work showed that it is possible to layer reforestation, biochar and enhanced weathering on a given plot of land to increase the yield of carbon capture per hectare and that doing so rigorously allow to create premium carbon permits. (Disclosure, Sam and I are investors in the Future Forest and are big fans of Jim)
  • In this scenario the amount of CO2 captured scales as a function of the area covered by the full stack of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) methods.
  • There are many landowners the world over with large estates and who are keen to drive incremental returns from their land, especially if the methods have additional co-benefit (soil carbonization via biochar and enhanced weathering acts as a fertilizer for instance)
  • Yet CDR science is young, fragmented and not exactly trivial to find and make sense of, so most landowners are either not aware of it or ignore it.
Stacking methods per hectare to maximise the yield of CDR and create a virtuous cycle
  • Landowners will be interested in using their land to capture carbon providing it doesn’t conflict with existing land use
  • Some pieces of land have the potential to stack several methods, thereby dramatically increasing the amount of CO2 captured per hectare.
  • We can use publicly available data to model the CDR potential of individual pieces of land, find the highest yielding ones and facilitate the roll out of land-based techniques at scale.
  • Found several large alpha users with large amounts of land (From tens of thousands of hectares to millions of hectares) and willing to investigate the carbon capture potential of their land with us;
  • Worked with world-class researchers out of University of Southampton and ETH Zurich to model the carbon capture potential using a range of data, for instance: temperature, humidity, soil composition, geological deposit, biological composition and transport infrastructure;
  • Work with people familiar with carbon markets to understand how the full value chain would operate, including what would a carbon right look like legally, how verification would work and how to finance large scale projects at Megaton scale.
Restor.eco, an amazing tool developed by ETH Zurich in partnership with Google to support restoration orgs.
  • Land-owners are unquestionably keen to understand how to get involved in CDR, both for the impact and the incremental revenue. We had many incredible chats with sophisticated custodians of large estates, in several countries. There is little doubt that if anyone can package CDR into something convenient for landowners (convenient being low upfront investment and low operational burden), it should be possible to sign up landowners at scale and at pace;
  • Modelling the potential of “newer” techniques is unreliable as there are too few field experiments to understand exactly how specific input impacts yield — for instance on biochar or enhanced weathering. Worse, most data sets available today have low resolution, meaning that new local data has to be produced for each given plot (ie. costs will mount quickly at any decent scale) or the prediction is likely to merely be a rough approximation;
  • Measuring the actual carbon captured over time is a very complicated affair, involving complex large scale carbon life cycle analysis and a lot of sampling over time — including of water systems going all the way to the ocean. The verification is bound to be expensive, spread over years and, crucially, open for debate. This matters all the more that some of the most promising land-based CDR methods have high scientific risks: enhanced weathering’s yield varies by multiple orders of magnitude from one experiment to the next and the carbon balance of biochar is still heavily debated.
  • Speaking with several academics, it appears that the maximum carbon content of an ecosystem is its wild state. To put things differently, over time, the best strategy to capture carbon through land-management methods is to restore ecosystems. Anything above the natural carbon content will tend to leak and potentially go back into the atmosphere over the long run. It probably means that land-management CDR is about restoring the ecosystem, optimal CDR happening as a byproduct. In this scenario, land-management CDR may not be as incremental as other methods and could be ignored (or at least severely discounted) by the nascent negative emissions’ market.

--

--

--

Scale-up CEO. Looking at climate-related companies. Ex-CEO @Skimlinks (Acq. in May 2020), Board member at VC-backed companies, investor. Aspiring pianist.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Climate Change & Its Impact on the World

Electricity — you can’t fight poverty without it.

Electrifying Africa Based on the U.S. Rural Electrification Model

It’s Time to Talk about Virtual Net Demand

A WARM CONVERSATION

Despite Soaring Prices the Oil Industry Stands To Lose

The United States: The Weakest Oil Superpower

Second Blog Mega Project (Work in progress)

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Sebastien Blanc

Sebastien Blanc

Scale-up CEO. Looking at climate-related companies. Ex-CEO @Skimlinks (Acq. in May 2020), Board member at VC-backed companies, investor. Aspiring pianist.

More from Medium

Learning #2: Can we turn shipping containers into carbon capture factories?

Fueling a better future

THE CLIMATE IS CHANGING.SO MUST ARCHITECTURE.

Driving Climate Solutions With Farmland